return to I Love My Journal
A Little Closer to Center...
Musings about Life, Linux, and Latter-day Saints.
Pages
About Me
Links


Tags
PERSONAL 520
SPIRITUAL 416
LDS 312
BOOK OF MORMON 237
SCRIPTURES 154
STUDIO-JOURNEY 129
RELIGION 112
LINUX 79
COMPUTERS 65
LIFE 60
GENERAL CONFERENCE 46
GENTOO 39
MISCELLANEOUS 37
MUSIC 37
PROGRAMMING 33
CARS 29
MICROSOFT 23
FAMILY 23
AUDIO 21
I LOVE MY JOURNAL 18
FUN 15
CHILDREN 12
CURRENT EVENTS 10
NATURE'S WAY 10
VIDEO 9
DRM 9
CONEXM 7
BABBLINGS 7
PROVO CITY CENTER TEMPLE 6
FRIENDS 6
HEROD THE FINK 5
GAMES 5
COMPUTER HARDWARE 5
DRUMS 4
HAND OF GOD 3
ADVERSITY 3
KDENLIVE 3
AUDIO HARDWARE 3
GENERAL INSANITY 3
STUDIO 3
THANKS4GIVING 2
CATS 2
MY JOURNAL 1
POETRY 1
FOREVERGREEN 1
EVERYDAY THOUGHTS 1
GOSPEL 1
PARENTING 1
YOUTH CONFERENCE 1
CHURCH NOTES 1
POLITICS 1


RSS Feed

RSS FeedSubscribe!
Tue - Dec 09, 2008 : 11:08 am
tired
   rated 0 times
>>next>>
<<previous<<
VLC Gripe
Awhile back, I found that many DVD titles released by Sony weren't able to be viewed with mplayer.  This annoyed me.

So, I investigated a bit and found that VLC (another wonderful media player) could not only play them back, but also rip them with ease.  Up until a bit ago, this has been the case since the writing of that article.

When version 0.9.6 of VLC was released, evidently a new scripting syntax was implemented which isn't backward compatible with the version 0.8.6i I've been using for months.

Try as I may, I cannot get VLC to rip any movies at all, let alone movies with Sony's stupid DRM installed.

Case in point:  I go grab my shiny new copy of The Dark Knight this morning and try to rip it using mplayer -dumstream.  It fails.  I try the new version of VLC and it fails.  I pound on it for 2 hours trying to get it to rip anything.  It fails.  So...

I revert back to the trusty old 0.8.6i version and try ripping it.  It works without a hitch.

So...  Why, Videolan, did you upgrade your program so drastically that now it won't do what I need it to?

Or maybe I just need to pound on the syntax a bit more to see if I'm missing something.  But sheesh... I really don't like learning the same thing twice, just because someone makes a program backward incompatible.